Does radiometric dating always involve carbon
Comparing these rocks with the products of present erosion, sedimentation, and earth movements, these earliest geologists soon concluded that the time required to form and sculpt the present Earth was immeasurably longer than had previously been thought.James Hutton, a physician-farmer and one of the founders of the science of geology, wrote in 1788, “The result, therefore, of our present inquiry is, that we find no vestige of a beginning, — no prospect of an end.” Although this may now sound like an overstatement, it nicely expresses the tremendous intellectual leap required when geologic time was finally and forever severed from the artificial limits imposed by the length of the human lifetime.In conclusion, this brief comment offers proof that both C-14 and other Radiometric dating methods do not fit in with the YEC theory regarding the age of the earth.he question of the ages of the Earth and its rock formations and features has fascinated philosophers, theologians, and scientists for centuries, primarily because the answers put our lives in temporal perspective.YECs have suggested that Radiometric dating is not reliable because the radiation rate may have been different in the past which would give the appearance of great age.However, this would involve a change in the atomic nuclear Strong-Force and we know this has never happened in the indefinite past.Until the 18th century, this question was principally in the hands of theologians, who based their calculations on biblical chronology.
When using the indexed correction-curve based on these independent sampling methods, Radiocarbon dating has become acceptably accurate to more or less than 50,000 years.Any change of as little as a few parts per trillion would have destroyed our sun and all the stars because they depend upon the current fine-tuned rate of radiation to hold them together in their present form.C-14 dating is indexed using Tree ring Dendrology, Varve (annual layers of sediment) Chronology, and Ice and Sea core analysis along with others.If these accumulation rates correlate with current sediment rates, you know that your measurements are accurate.
In this regard, undisturbed top volcanic layers are always found to be younger than lower volcanic layers. Another cross-checking feature involves Sea-Floor spreading and Continental Drift.By the mid- to late 1800s, geologists, physicists, and chemists were searching for ways to quantify the age of the Earth.